If Not Switching, Why?
-
1 45.24% (718 votes) -
2 30.43% (483 votes) -
3 20.6% (327 votes) -
4 3.72% (59 votes)
| 1 |
45.24%
(718 votes)
|
| 2 |
30.43%
(483 votes)
|
| 3 |
20.6%
(327 votes)
|
| 4 |
3.72%
(59 votes)
|
Leave comment
Comments
My Vista laptop works fine. I'll move to Win 7 about 6 months after its release (to give the pioneers time to catch the arrows in their backs), same as i did when moving from XP to Vista.
Tried the release candidate. It doesn't impress me. I'll be using XP at work until the boss is unable to buy a new machine with XP installed. At home ubuntu is everything I need.
I don't have a small penis, nor a midlife crisis, nor money to burn, nor an ego complex, nor time to waste, nor low self esteem, nor a desire to be trendy, nor have friends and neighbors that I must try to impress, nor a belief that Microsoft is the shepherd that I must follow, nor am I naive about the benefits to the new OS so when 64 bit Windows is necessary to run a game I really desire to play, then and only then will I consider it but Windows 8 will likely be out by then.
Horrible user interface, admittedly better than Vista's but the start menu is terrible. Microsoft learned nothing from Apple in the GUI design. And why the tiered product? Just sell Windows 7 Ultimate at the cheapest price you can instead of selling versions of Windows with its balls cut off for a "discount"
I'm like Steve Gibson--I'll think about switching to it after it has been out a year. That policy saved me from ever having to deal with the Vista disaster.
What is Windows 7?
I have thr RC version and I can't see where it offers anything I need that I don't have with XP Pro. I don't give a crap about fancy looking interfaces that move everything around so I can't find it! I don't need to learn a new "interface" every time MS launches a new operating system or Office product....when will they wake up and realize that some people don't like having to master a newly shuffled interface every couple of years.
I was for a long time dual Win/Linux user. However, issues with Vista broke the chain (first Win version I didn't get within short time of release). I got my first Mac and now I am dual Mac/Linux user with legacy XP lingering about. I do not see that changing in quite a few years coming. Simply do not care for Win 7 or any future MS project, though from expert reviews I trust that it have solved some Vista issues in great manner.
NO WAY! The best practice up to now has been to wait til MS issues the SECOND Service Pack on any new OS. I also tend to agree with Bozo and shep...wait to get a new machine spec'd to enable it to support the new OS.
Of course I'll be installing Win 7, when I build my next PC. However, I won't be "upgrading" any of my existing XP based computers; not unless an application comes along that requires Win 7 to run. I don't expect that to happen before my XP hardware goes obsolete and retires.
Other. I'll consider switching when buying a new machine. Do you switch out your car's base software just because Toyota comes out with a new model? No, you wait until you're buying a new unit, properly spec'd so the hardware and software are well matched. The idea of "upgrading" to a whole new OS is just wrong. Installing an OS service pack or a point release is an "upgrade". Changing major OS versions is a rebuild, and if you do it right it will include some hardware changes. Right now I'm running older Windows, Mac and Linux. I will do my homework to evaluate Win 7 when I'm ready to buy.
Tried Win 7 as beta. Performance was same as Vista. Unconfigurable start menu is a pain. I'll wait to see if there are meaningful changes before I plunk the change down.