For those of us who's wives married them for their income and as a babysitter for their children, going 2 weeks without sex is just part of life. :)
Brian Henderson said on Dec 13 2008, 02:07 PM:
For some of us, being online is a requirement for making a living, therefore being without online access at all means we don't eat. Certainly being without sex may be a sacrifice, but you don't usually drop dead by abstaining for a while, whereas not eating for a while tends to be bad for your health.
Brian said on Dec 13 2008, 01:18 PM:
For some, loss of the internet would be loss of sex!
Dom said on Dec 13 2008, 12:43 PM:
Only 2 weeks between sex? Please, I'm married, 2 months is more like it! That's why I need the internet!!!
Don Marsh said on Dec 13 2008, 11:40 AM:
Wow. Dvorak Blog readers are overwhelmingly willing to abstain from sex.
sarah said on Dec 13 2008, 09:31 AM:
_# bobby said on Dec 13 2008, 09:02 AM:
how can you miss something you dont get anyway?_
THIS
bobby said on Dec 13 2008, 09:02 AM:
how can you miss something you dont get anyway?
M. Hume said on Dec 13 2008, 07:44 AM:
Not to be over-the-top but a ladies 'that time of the month' is a week right there and according to married couples, one month is a pretty small feat of which you might abstain yourself.
This is coming from a young fish at the tender age of 22 and I can realistically admit that two weeks without internet is a pretty big inconvenience in contrast to a well placed couple of weeks without sex: busy times in our careers, holiday traveling, exam season (for my younger peers). Alternatively, the value of sex may change depending on how long it's been since you've last had sex. If I went a year without sex I think I'd consider bribing a girl with my computer.
Thanks for listening,
Michael
Comments
For those of us who's wives married them for their income and as a babysitter for their children, going 2 weeks without sex is just part of life. :)
For some of us, being online is a requirement for making a living, therefore being without online access at all means we don't eat. Certainly being without sex may be a sacrifice, but you don't usually drop dead by abstaining for a while, whereas not eating for a while tends to be bad for your health.
For some, loss of the internet would be loss of sex!
Only 2 weeks between sex? Please, I'm married, 2 months is more like it! That's why I need the internet!!!
Wow. Dvorak Blog readers are overwhelmingly willing to abstain from sex.
_# bobby said on Dec 13 2008, 09:02 AM: how can you miss something you dont get anyway?_ THIS
how can you miss something you dont get anyway?
Not to be over-the-top but a ladies 'that time of the month' is a week right there and according to married couples, one month is a pretty small feat of which you might abstain yourself. This is coming from a young fish at the tender age of 22 and I can realistically admit that two weeks without internet is a pretty big inconvenience in contrast to a well placed couple of weeks without sex: busy times in our careers, holiday traveling, exam season (for my younger peers). Alternatively, the value of sex may change depending on how long it's been since you've last had sex. If I went a year without sex I think I'd consider bribing a girl with my computer. Thanks for listening, Michael